PDSAT Report 17B-003 Possible duplicate or overlapping learning aims

Home Forums Data issues PDSAT Report 17B-003 Possible duplicate or overlapping learning aims

Tagged: 

This topic contains 4 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  mef003 1 month ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • mef003
    Participant

    Hi Everyone,

    I have been looking at the PDSAT report 17B-003 – Possible duplicate or overlapping learning aims for AEB funding

    We run non accredited ESOL aims, which are at entry 1 to entry 3 level. These learners have an overlapping date and seem to show that we have claimed four times the amount of funding for these learners:
    Z0004300 -‘Non regulated SFA formula funded provision, Pre-Entry Level, ESOL, 101 to 196 hrs

    Our courses have the same non accreditd course aim but they are set up as:

    JCE1-1
    JCE1-2A
    JCE1-3A
    JCE2-1

    The classes show three steps within Entry 1 and then move to Entry 2.

    Can we claim the funding as is for the four lines, as they are seperate stepping stones for the learners OR do we need to apply the apportionment of funding for the 4 aims?

     
    #188809

    steveh
    Participant

    Hiya

    It’s absolutely fine to run like this, it’s not your fault the aims aren’t specific enough! As long as you have clear learning outcomes you can show an auditor so they can see the courses are clearly different, it’s not an issue (i use to have the same with needing to use the same non-reg aim for painting and drawing and sculpture).

     
    #188976

    mef003
    Participant

    Hi Steve
    Thank you for replying. Were your courses for painting and drawing under AEB or community learning?

     
    #188978

    steveh
    Participant

    i was working at a Specialist Designated Institute so they were AEB funded.

     
    #188980

    mef003
    Participant

    Thanks Steve.

     
    #190167
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.