Withdrawal Evidence

Home Forums Data issues Withdrawal Evidence

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Andrew Mackenzie 1 week, 5 days ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author

  • Andrew Mackenzie

    Hi Everyone, hoping someone may have clarification.

    I’ve started at a new training provider within the compliance dept for a company who provide Apprenticeships. As part of their withdrawal process they await a copy of an email/letter from the employer to confirm the learner withdrawal, This is creating a huge bottleneck and delay of the processing of their withdrawals.

    I’ve worked at many training providers in the past and never used employer evidence as part of the withdrawal as long as there is a last day of training, which includes supporting last day training evidence and that there is a learner withdrawal reason, this has been sufficient even under ESFA audits.

    I’m presuming some previous compliance read funding guidance Paragraph 206, Scenario 3:-

    – The employer must notify the provider that the apprentice has left.
    – The employer can stop payments through their digital account.
    – The provider records the end date on the ILR.

    But it doesn’t state evidence is required direct from the employer, such as an email or letter.

    Does anyone else use this method with withdrawals?




    Martin West

    Hi Andrew,
    You are correct as although the employer has an obligation to inform you and this could be used to trigger the withdrawal it may not be evidence that supports the funding rule that applies which is:

    P219. If an apprentice leaves without completing their apprenticeship, the last date of learning, including the apprenticeship programme learning aim, is the date you have evidence the apprentice was still in learning for any learning that is part of their apprenticeship.

    Your organisation should have a withdrawal policy to avoid claiming funding when a learner is no longer in learning.


    Andrew Mackenzie

    Hi Martin, thanks for the reply, I pretty much thought that these emails wernt required. I just wanted to see if anyone else used the same process.

    I’ll look at changing their process and removing the bottleneck.

    Thanks for the help.


Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.